2024年7月9日火曜日

UFO Files: Cutting Edge Alien Tech Recovered (S2, E13) | Full Episode

UFO Files: Cutting Edge Alien Tech Recovered (S2, E13) | Full Episode
2020-09-10-000e1.jpg ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ If you tweet a real UFO picture to a UFO researcher... most of them don't show any interest lol. So does that mean most researchers are fakes? Real UFO pictures are useful for exposing fake researchers lol. :://////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Why are there no UFO images in the world? o Cameras themselves have switched to digital, and their performance has deteriorated drastically compared to film cameras lol o Considering the probability of photographing a UFO, you don't make any money from it lol If you had to put a price on it, it would be about 100 million yen per shot lol ******************************************** ついに、UFO構造物の原理が発見される? 「光で検出できない“不可視な”円柱構造 光や電磁波を反射や散乱しない構造を単一物質で実現 | 東工大ニュース | 東京工業大学 https://titech.ac.jp/news/2019/044158」 ********************************************* 撮影したUFOの構造が、パイプ状だったので、不思議だと思っていた・・・・・ しかし、2019年ごろのニュースで、 それが、「光で検出できない“不可視な”円柱構造 光や電磁波を反射や散乱しない構造」と判明? これで、撮影したUFOが、信ぴょう性のあるものとして証明できたかもしれない? sunprint2021.jpg
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Even with UAP, sharp images will not come out w You are cheated by infrared shadow puppets w UAP's powerful weapon is the force field from objects. Even if a submarine collides, it will not break. US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The reason why unidentified flying objects cannot be photographed well with a digital camera is that they have a strong infrared cut filter. Film cameras can shoot well because they don't have it. Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected. In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++ img003.jpg 3210913_0005.jpg img005.jpg S20210913_0002.jpg ######## Vintage photos are mostly monochrome, with very few color prints.
In the case of color, it will be faded after 30 years. Therefore,
I made organic pigments as color formers. Moreover, the dot type will be the world's first.
######## # Shooting with color reversal film. From the film, create a magnifying negative. Mixture of pigment and photosensitizer on printing paper, plastic paper, Roughly spray. After drying, overlay the magnifying negative and use the UV exposure machine, Burn. Then wipe with tap water, sponge, etc. An image appears. It is dry and one step is completed. Repeat this process, replacing the pigment with C ・ M ・ Y ・ B. For this print, I used C, M, Y photosensitizers ooimg016.jpg

0 件のコメント: