・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
In the age of film cameras, UFOs could be photographed,
Is it no longer possible to shoot UFOs with digital cameras?
That's because digital cameras are equipped with powerful IR cut filters.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。
UFOs operate in the electromagnetic domain, invisible to the human eye. Older cameras can capture the infrared region, which is part of that electromagnetic spectrum.
。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。
UFOs are difficult to see with the naked eye,
In the age of film cameras, UFOs could be photographed,
Is it no longer
possible to shoot UFOs with digital cameras?
That's because digital
cameras are equipped with powerful IR cut filters.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
Infrared light has the characteristic of being easier to pass through the spatial absorption band than visible light, so it is effective for grasping UFOs hidden behind it.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
If you tweet a real UFO picture to a UFO researcher... most of them don't show any interest lol. So does that mean most researchers are fakes? Real UFO pictures are useful for exposing fake researchers lol.
::////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Why are there no UFO images in the world?
o Cameras themselves have switched to digital, and their performance has deteriorated drastically compared to film cameras lol
o Considering the probability of photographing a UFO, you don't make any money from it lol If you had to put a price on it, it would be about 100 million yen per shot lol
********************************************
ついに、UFO構造物の原理が発見される？
「光で検出できない“不可視な”円柱構造 光や電磁波を反射や散乱しない構造を単一物質で実現
| 東工大ニュース | 東京工業大学 https://titech.ac.jp/news/2019/044158」
*********************************************
撮影したUFOの構造が、パイプ状だったので、不思議だと思っていた・・・・・ しかし、２０１９年ごろのニュースで、
それが、「光で検出できない“不可視な”円柱構造 光や電磁波を反射や散乱しない構造」と判明？
これで、撮影したUFOが、信ぴょう性のあるものとして証明できたかもしれない？
*********************************************
Sensitivity of photosensitive ink, color taste, thickness of coating, unevenness required condition ... Pretty, the variable element works on the work of the work is the difference from ordinary photos www
My blog is simple and rudimentary. I just copy the ivy content in one place to another blog. for example, https://cafevoice.wordpress.com/ https://magicmoon2007.blogspot.com/ The composition is YOUTUBE video link, original photo, Three points of the original text. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ UAP experiment Part 1. Is it real if UFO researchers react to real UAP images? Mostly fake and government-intentioned? ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++ The fact that the United States has approved UAP means that manned UAP may have been successful, that is, it is meaningless to carry out the Artemis program, which allows it to pass through the Van Allen belt unscathed. ++++++++++++++++++++++++ Landing a NASA-developed UAP on an asteroid, using gravity lessen or gyro navigation to deflect its orbit or make a soft landing on any surface? In other words, can you develop planetary resources? ++++++++++++++++++++++++ UAP that can realize a planetary missile that can be guided to any point on the earth In fact, unidentified flying objects, UAPs, etc. in books are not captured in the photographs. U.S. Navy UAP data may have been tampered with? *************************** Is the real UAP image not coming out because the Pentagon is buying it? If so, will this image be bought for $ 100,000? Please pay by Paypal for the transfer. *************************** Most UFO research groups around the world may be fake. I don't even have a realistic photo of a UFO. Most UFO Sites Don't Believe In UFOs? Even if you look at a realistic UAP image, there is no reaction at all? Doesn't even the Pentagon have realistic UAP images? ＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊ If dark energy is put into practical use before 2030, will the future be harsh unless we take into consideration that gas energy will almost never be used? Is the United States the top in terms of basic patents? Will it be put into practical use in 2025? Is the UAP information disclosure by the US Department of Defense part of that? Are unidentified flying objects under blackout worldwide? Are authorities repeatedly hiding information? Is it just light or ghosts that are reported? Why don't everyone shoot when they have a camera?
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿