Modern pictures are completed with digital data on the computer.One-ness
Classical technique photography consists of an amalog camera, film, and finally on paper
#-X-76 https://youtu.be/3rNDeKmWt_U
#UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film*
The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably
a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it.
At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere
like a force field is formed. # UAP
The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown.
This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome.
#UAP announced by the US Department of Defense
A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally?
Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center?
A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object.
https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by
the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more,
you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
by the way・・
When the camera was still in the analog era
Kodachrome film came out w
I knew there was ...
There was no film scanner. To be exact,
There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww
Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww
Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen?
Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO
But found ww
When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ...
However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ...
UFO is clear ... ww
When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿