2022年12月9日金曜日

#koya


LLPP.jpg 010.jpg


################
DSC_0063.jpg PIC123T0005.jpg キャプチopopoャ キャg000プチャ ffPICT0001.jpg ffPICT0005.jpg ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Even with UAP, sharp images will not come out w You are cheated by infrared shadow puppets w UAP's powerful weapon is the force field from objects. Even if a submarine collides, it will not break. US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected. In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++ #pigment #photo #print #handmade #art #dot #vintage
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
The concept of vintage printing is already ww It's because digital pigment prints came out. That is, an original print is input to a personal computer, and a digital print is outputted as a finished product. Still, the original print is a worthwhile ww ######################

Ancient Aliens: Ronald Reagan's Shocking UFO Encounter


woter112.jpg キャプチopopoャ PIC123T0005.jpg img005.jpg 3210913_0005.jpg
020.jpg ######## Vintage photos are mostly monochrome, with very few color prints.
In the case of color, it will be faded after 30 years. Therefore,
I made organic pigments as color formers. Moreover, the dot type will be the world's first.
######## # To negative film, but you need a dark room ... # On a PC, it is possible that the negative film, made with ink-jet printing output. # Thus, no longer cumbersome darkroom work, # All, you can work in a bright room. Since # pigmented photosensitive solution is changed in light and temperature, # The storage, need a refrigerator. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Even with UAP, sharp images will not come out w You are cheated by infrared shadow puppets w UAP's powerful weapon is the force field from objects. Even if a submarine collides, it will not break. US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected. In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++

dearMoon Crew Announcement! |


2020-09-10-000e1.jpg sunprint2021.jpg
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Even with UAP, sharp images will not come out w You are cheated by infrared shadow puppets w UAP's powerful weapon is the force field from objects. Even if a submarine collides, it will not break. US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The reason why unidentified flying objects cannot be photographed well with a digital camera is that they have a strong infrared cut filter. Film cameras can shoot well because they don't have it. Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected. In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++ img003.jpg 3210913_0005.jpg img005.jpg S20210913_0002.jpg ######## Vintage photos are mostly monochrome, with very few color prints.
In the case of color, it will be faded after 30 years. Therefore,
I made organic pigments as color formers. Moreover, the dot type will be the world's first.
######## # Shooting with color reversal film. From the film, create a magnifying negative. Mixture of pigment and photosensitizer on printing paper, plastic paper, Roughly spray. After drying, overlay the magnifying negative and use the UV exposure machine, Burn. Then wipe with tap water, sponge, etc. An image appears. It is dry and one step is completed. Repeat this process, replacing the pigment with C ・ M ・ Y ・ B. For this print, I used C, M, Y photosensitizers ooimg016.jpg

2022年12月8日木曜日

#koya


img01af0.jpg 2020-09-10-0003.jpg
Infrared light has the characteristic of being easier to pass through the spatial absorption band than visible light, so it is effective for grasping UFOs hidden behind it. aa10913_0003.jpg The reason why unidentified flying objects cannot be photographed well with a digital camera is that they have a strong infrared cut filter. Film cameras can shoot well because they don't have it. ######## Vintage photos are mostly monochrome, with very few color prints.
In the case of color, it will be faded after 30 years. Therefore,
I made organic pigments as color formers. Moreover, the dot type will be the world's first.
####### PIC123T0005.jpg キャg000プチャ キャプチopopoャ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Maybe this is the only UAP or UFO photo in the world? Why is UAP difficult to see in photos? Probably because the power of UAP is the force field. Therefore, it is difficult to shoot, and the only possible case is when the main body can be seen through as force field transmitted light due to the strong reflection of the sun. #UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film* The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it. At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome. #UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ UFO sightings are every day, but ... Most of them are illusions? So it's rarely filmed. There are movies, but most of them are edited? Even with UAP, sharp images will not come out w You are cheated by infrared shadow puppets w UAP's powerful weapon is the force field from objects. Even if a submarine collides, it will not break. US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected. In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++ ppimg013.jpg ooimg016.jpg

#UFO-camera


XXX03 img_1_m (1)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Maybe this is the only UAP or UFO photo in the world? Why is UAP difficult to see in photos? Probably because the power of UAP is the force field. Therefore, it is difficult to shoot, and the only possible case is when the main body can be seen through as force field transmitted light due to the strong reflection of the sun. #UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film* The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it. At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome. #UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ UFO sightings are every day, but ... Most of them are illusions? So it's rarely filmed. There are movies, but most of them are edited? aa10913_0003.jpg ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Even with UAP, sharp images will not come out w You are cheated by infrared shadow puppets w UAP's powerful weapon is the force field from objects. Even if a submarine collides, it will not break. US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information. ######## Vintage photos are mostly monochrome, with very few color prints. In the case of color, it will be faded after 30 years. Therefore, I made organic pigments as color formers. Moreover, the dot type will be the world's first. ######## # Shooting with color reversal film. From the film, create a magnifying negative. Mixture of pigment and photosensitizer on printing paper, plastic paper, Roughly spray. After drying, overlay the magnifying negative and use the UV exposure machine, Burn. Then wipe with tap water, sponge, etc. An image appears. It is dry and one step is completed. Repeat this process, replacing the pigment with C · M · Y · B. For this print, I used C, M, Y photosensitizers.

#food


XXX01 sunprint003.jpg
DSC_0067.jpg キャプチopopoャ キャg000プチャ PIC123T0005.jpg ffPICT0001.jpg DOG-01.jpg ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Even with UAP, sharp images will not come out w You are cheated by infrared shadow puppets w UAP's powerful weapon is the force field from objects. Even if a submarine collides, it will not break. US10322827B2 - High frequency gravitational wave generator - ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected. In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww ++++++++++++++++++++++++ The fact that the United States has approved UAP means that manned UAP may have been successful, that is, it is meaningless to carry out the Artemis program, which allows it to pass through the Van Allen belt unscathed. ++++++++++++++++++++++++ Landing a NASA-developed UAP on an asteroid, using gravity lessen or gyro navigation to deflect its orbit or make a soft landing on any surface? In other words, can you develop planetary resources? ++++++++++++++++++++++++ UAP that can realize a planetary missile that can be guided to any point on the earth In fact, unidentified flying objects, UAPs, etc. in books are not captured in the photographs. U.S. Navy UAP data may have been tampered with? *************************** Is the real UAP image not coming out because the Pentagon is buying it? If so, will this image be bought for $ 100,000? Please pay by Paypal for the transfer. *************************** Most UFO research groups around the world may be fake. I don't even have a realistic photo of a UFO. Most UFO Sites Don't Believe In UFOs? Even if you look at a realistic UAP image, there is no reaction at all? Doesn't even the Pentagon have realistic UAP images? ************************ If dark energy is put into practical use before 2030, will the future be harsh unless we take into consideration that gas energy will almost never be used? Is the United States the top in terms of basic patents? Will it be put into practical use in 2025? Is the UAP information disclosure by the US Department of Defense part of that? Are unidentified flying objects under blackout worldwide? Are authorities repeatedly hiding information? Is it just light or ghosts that are reported? Why don't everyone shoot when they have a camera? ****************************** Modern pictures are completed with digital data on the computer. Classical technique photography consists of an amalog camera, film, and finally on paper

Patient Seventeen (FULL MOVIE)


STprintphoto-12.jpg LLPP.jpg
img005.jpg 3210913_0005.jpg DSC00083.jpg My blog is simple and rudimentary. I just copy the ivy content in one place to another blog. for example, https://magicmoon2007.blogspot.com/ The composition is YOUTUBE video link, original photo, Three points of the original text. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ UAP experiment Part 1. Is it real if UFO researchers react to real UAP images? Mostly fake and government-intentioned? 。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。 UFOs operate in the electromagnetic domain, invisible to the human eye. Older cameras can capture the infrared region, which is part of that electromagnetic spectrum. 。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。 UFOs are difficult to see with the naked eye, In the age of film cameras, UFOs could be photographed, Is it no longer possible to shoot UFOs with digital cameras? That's because digital cameras are equipped with powerful IR cut filters. ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ Infrared light has the characteristic of being easier to pass through the spatial absorption band than visible light, so it is effective for grasping UFOs hidden behind it. ///////////////////////////////////////// aa10913_0003.jpg