Modern pictures are completed with digital data on the computer.One-ness
Classical technique photography consists of an amalog camera, film, and finally on paper
Pigment photography production is surprisingly . However, as there are many variable elements, like the normal picture, you can not always make the same thing. That's where the interest is divided. This is a photo illustration to the last. It is not computer graphics either. The ultimate goal is the original vintage print.
#VegaPigment Rainy
#VegaGumprint NY MoonDance
#UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-
Kodachrome film
>>>>Color reversal film, Kodachrome discontinued in 2009<<<
At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere
like a force field is formed. # UAP
The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown.
This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome.
#UAP announced by the US Department of Defense
A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally?
Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center?
A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object.
https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ
Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by
the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more,
you can expect new information.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
by the way・・
When the camera was still in the analog era
Kodachrome film came out w
I knew there was ...
There was no film scanner. To be exact,
There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww
Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww
Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen?
Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected.
In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO
But found ww
When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ...
However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ...
UFO is clear ... ww
When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww
+++++++++++++++++++++